Every few months, some real estate agent will get all spooled up about dual agency.
Now it’s my turn.
Prompted (this time) by discussions on several posts and comments at Inman News, I find myself scratching my head. It puzzles me that some real estate agents and brokers see nothing wrong with representing both the buyer and seller in the same transaction.
Let me be clear. Dual Agency is perfectly legal in
In particular, my beef is with single agent dual agency. Where
What’s Wrong with Single Agent Dual Agency?
Ask any seller of real estate what their primary goal is. I’ll bet you a commission check they say, “Getting as much money as possible for my property”. Ask any real estate buyer what their primary goal is and I’ll throw in a first-born child if they don’t say, “To buy a home at the lowest price possible”.How then can the same agent facilitate reaching both of these conflicting goals?
I don’t care how much experience you have, I don’t care how fair you are, I don’t care if you can walk on water. One agent can not get the seller the most money and save the buyer the most money in the same transaction. Period.
Single agent dual agency is a stunningly obvious conflict of interest.
Michelle Lind, Esq., general Counsel to the Arizona Association of Realtors says this about dual agency (source –
http://www.phoenixrealestateguy.com/on-dual-agency/
No comments:
Post a Comment